[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060915014726.GD23664@Krystal>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:47:26 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
>
> * Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > also, the other disadvantages i listed very much count too. Static
> > > > > tracepoints are fundamentally limited because:
> > > > >
[...]
> Right now they are
> pretty heavy cons as far as LTT goes, so obviously they have a primary
> impact on the topic at hand (whic is whether to merge LTT or not).
>
Ingo, why are you arguing about static instrumentation when I don't submit any
static instrumentation in my patch ? You can argue about static VS dynamic
instrumentation all you want, but please don't apply this debate to a dicision
about including or not a core tracing infrastructure that has nothing to do
with the way instrumentation or probes are inserted.
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists