| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060915025745.GM3034@melbourne.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:57:45 +1000 From: David Chinner <dgc@....com> To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> > >> I'll build system with gcc 3.4 > > > >It's not a compiler issue. > > > >Binary search should solve this mystery. > > I was wrong - it's in vanilla tree > (http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/mm-dmesg1). > > cat hunt | head -n 3 > origin.patch > BAD > libata-ignore-cfa-signature-while-sanity-checking-an-atapi-device.patch Not sure what this means.... > I can reproduce this bug with all CONFIG_DEBUG_*=y. > (only > CONFIG_DEBUG_SYNCHRO_TEST=m > CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m > as modules) I notice you're running i386 with 4k stacks - I wonder if you're blowing the stack by running xfs on loopback. I've been testing on x86_64 and ia64 which don't have those issues. Can you try with 8K stacks instead of 4k stacks? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists