linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:10:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, karim@...rsys.com,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
	Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108


* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > this is being worked on actively: there's the "djprobes" patchset, 
> > which includes a simplified disassembler to analyze common target 
> > code and can thus insert much faster, call-a-trampoline-function 
> > based tracepoints that are just as fast as (or faster than) 
> > compile-time, static tracepoints.
> 
> Who is going to implement this for every arch?

someone who is interested enough in that arch growing that capability?

> Is this now the official party line that only archs, which implement 
> all of this, can make use of efficient tracing?

that's certainly my preference - kprobes have lots of other advantages 
besides tracing. Whether that becomes the "official party line" depends 
on the technological analysis of the situation which will ultimately 
shape the outcome of this discussion.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/