[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060915211550.GB11291@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:15:50 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com> wrote:
> [...] Consider, though, that I'm factually explaining the real-life
> result of resistance to static instrumentation. [...]
with all due respect, do you realize the possibility that this
resistance might be a genuine technical opinion on my part that is
driven by the quality of the code being offered and by the conceptual
problems static tracing introduces in the future, as i see them? And
thus, maybe, what you wrote:
" and instead use their corporate bodyweight to pressure/seduce kernel
developers working for them into pushing their new great [...] "
could possibly be total, utter nonsense?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists