[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450B39DF.5000909@opersys.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:40:15 -0400
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Let us design a static marker mechanism that can be coupled at run
> time either to a dynamic system such as systemtap, or by a specialized
> tracing system such as lttnng (!). Then "markers" === "static
> instrumentation", for purposes of the kernel developer. If the
> markers are lightweight enough, then a distribution kernel can afford
> keeping them compiled in.
I'm all for it.
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists