[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060916155657.a233b54d.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:56:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
karim@...rsys.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:43:42 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -354,9 +354,8 @@ no_kprobe:
> */
> fastcall void *__kprobes trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
> - struct hlist_head *head;
> - struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
> + struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL, *tmp;
> + struct list_head *head;
> unsigned long flags, orig_ret_address = 0;
> unsigned long trampoline_address =(unsigned long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
Wanna fix the whitespace wreckage while you're there??
i386's kprobe_handler() appears to forget to reenable preemption in the
if (p->pre_handler && p->pre_handler(p, regs)) case?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists