[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060916231407.GA23132@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:14:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, karim@...rsys.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> [...] instead of delving further into secondary issues, please let me
> get back to the primary issues [...]
here's a list of some of those "secondary issues" that we were
discussing, and which you opted not to "further dvelve into":
firstly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] any tracepoints have an maintainance overhead, which is barely
> different between dynamic and static tracing [...]
secondly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] at the source level you can remove a static tracepoint as easily
> as a dynamic tracepoint, [...]
thirdly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] It would also add virtually no maintainance overhead [...]
[see the previous mails for the full context on these items.]
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists