[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060916234047.GA26846@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:40:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
karim@...rsys.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> > > Third run : same LTTng instrumentation, with a kprobe handler
> > > triggered by each event traced.
> >
> > where exactly did you put the kprobe handler?
>
> ltt_relay_reserve_slot.
>
> See http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn/tests/kernel/test-kprobes.c to insert
> the kprobe. Tests done on LTTng 0.5.111, on a x86 3GHz with
> hyperthreading.
ok. In what way did you enable LTTng instrumentation? I have 0.5.108
installed, and i'd like to make sure i do everything as you did, to make
the tests comparable. Which kernel config options (default ones?), and
what precise lttcl commands did you use, were they the usual:
lttctl -n trace -d -l /mnt/debugfs/ltt -t /tmp/trace
? What filesystem does /tmp/trace reside on?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists