[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609172144200.6761@scrub.home>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:45:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, karim@...rsys.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > [...] I think Ingo said that some "static tracepoints" (eg.
> > > annotation) could be acceptable.
> >
> > No, he made it rather clear, that as far as possible he only wants
> > dynamic annotations (e.g. via function attributes).
>
> what you say is totally and utterly nonsensical misrepresentation of
> what i have said. I always said: i support in-source annotations too (I
> even suggested APIs how to do them),
Some consistency would certainly help:
'my suggested API is not "barely usable" for static tracers but "totally
unusable".'
<20060916082214.GD6317@...e.hu>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists