[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060917223455.GC8791@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:34:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models
* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Static tracers also need the
> > guarantee of a _full set_ of static markups. It is that _guarantee_ of a
> > full set that i'm arguing against primarily.
>
> To those who are still reading this, let's fill this with a bit of
> meaning (Ingo is unfortunately rather unspecific here):
Please make your own points instead of positing to "fill in" my points
with "a bit of meaning". My words can certainly speak for themselves,
and they do so in extensive specificity.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists