[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060917140009.GA15534@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:00:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
karim@...rsys.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:37:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > --------------->
> > Subject: [patch] kprobes: speed INT3 trap handling up on i386
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >
> > speed up kprobes trap handling by special-casing kernel-space
> > INT3 traps (which do not occur otherwise) and doing a kprobes
> > handler check - instead of redirecting over the i386-die-notifier
> > chain.
> >
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Not that it would make any difference to the actual kprobe
> performance, but I think that not using the die-notifier chain makes
> the DIE_INT3 handling in kprobe_exceptions_notify() useless.
yeah, indeed - i'll add your patch to the kprobes patchset.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists