[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609171651370.6761@scrub.home>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > This thread would be much better off talking about how to go about
> > implementing lightweight markers rather than spent on mindless rants.
>
> i agree, as long as it's lightweight markers for _dynamic tracers_, so
> that we keep our options open - as per the arguments above.
Could you please explain, why we can't have markers which are usable by
any tracer?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists