[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450E56ED.5050201@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:21:01 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
To: karim@...rsys.com
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> The bottom line is :
>>
>> LTTng impact on the studied phenomenon : 35% slower
>>
>> LTTng+kprobes impact on the studied phenomenon : 73% slower
>>
>> Therefore, I conclude that on this type of high event rate workload, kprobes
>> doubles the tracer impact on the system.
>
> Amen to that. Hopefully this puts to rest the myth of Mr. Scrub.
If it wasn't because it's so sad, this would be hysterically funny.
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists