[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450E83DC.4050503@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:32:44 +0400
From: "Eugeny S. Mints" <eugeny.mints@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PowerOP, PowerOP Core, 1/2
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The PowerOP Core provides completely arch independent interface
>> to create and control operating points which consist of arbitrary
>> subset of power parameters available on a certain platform.
>> Also, PowerOP Core provides optional SysFS interface to access
>> operating point from userspace.
>
> Please inline patches and sign them off.
hmm, seems my bad. will double check.
>
> Also if you are providing new userland interface, describe it... in
> Documentation/ABI.
seems already discussed
>> +struct powerop_driver {
>> + char *name;
>> + void *(*create_point) (const char *pwr_params, va_list args);
>> + int (*set_point) (void *md_opt);
>> + int (*get_point) (void *md_opt, const char *pwr_params, va_list args);
>> +};
>
> We can certainly get better interface than va_list, right?
Please elaborate.
>
>> +
>> +#
>> +# powerop
>> +#
>> +
>> +menu "PowerOP (Power Management)"
>> +
>> +config POWEROP
>> + tristate "PowerOP Core"
>> + help
>
> Hohum, this is certainly going to be clear to confused user...
please elaborate.
>> + list_add_tail(&opt->node, &named_opt_list);
>> + strcpy(registered_names[registered_opt_number], id);
>> + registered_opt_number++;
>> + up(&named_opt_list_mutex);
>> +
>> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&powerop_notifier_list,
>> + POWEROP_REGISTER_EVENT, id);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + fail_set_name:
>> + kfree(opt->md_opt);
>> +
>> + fail_opt_create:
>> + kfree(registered_names[registered_opt_number]);
>> +
>> + fail_name_nomem:
>> + kfree(opt);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> Careful about spaces vs. tabs...
will double check but I'm pretty sure I ran all files thru lindent.
> ...so, you got support for 20 operating points... And this should
> include devices, too, right?
sorry, don't understand the question. an operating point is a set of platform
power parameters.
>How is it going to work on 8cpu box? will
> you have states like cpu1_800MHz_cpu2_1600MHz_cpu3_800MHz_... ?
i do not operate with term 'state' so I don't understand what it means here.
Eugeny
> Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists