[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060918144658.GC15605@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:46:58 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
Cc: karim@...rsys.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Hi Jes,
* Jes Sorensen (jes@....com) wrote:
> Everything has performance limitations, you keep running around touting
> that static is the only thing thats not a problem. Now show us the
> numbers!
>
If I may : I showed in a precedent thread that kprobes impact doubled LTTng's
impact on the system. If you are interested in numbers about LTTng, here they
are :
"The LTTng tracer : A Low Impact Performance and Behavior Monitor for GNU/Linux"
(OLS2006)
http://ltt.polymtl.ca/papers/desnoyers-ols2006.pdf
(and for Ingo : I haven't rerun the tests on your modified kprobes, it will
come in time. But I do not really expect that 30-50 cycles compared to 1500
will make a very big difference.)
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists