[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609172108.37707.dtor@insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:08:36 -0400
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To: Om Narasimhan <om.turyx@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: kmalloc to kzalloc patches for drivers/base
On Sunday 17 September 2006 20:53, Om Narasimhan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 2b8755d..e08950b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int platform_device_add_resources(struct
> {
> struct resource *r;
>
> - r = kmalloc(sizeof(struct resource) * num, GFP_KERNEL);
> + r = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource) * num, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (r) {
> memcpy(r, res, sizeof(struct resource) * num);
> pdev->resource = r;
Just out of curiosity could you tell me what is the benefit of
zeroing allocated memory here?
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ int platform_device_add_data(struct plat
> {
> void *d;
>
> - d = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + d = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (d) {
> memcpy(d, data, size);
> pdev->dev.platform_data = d;
>
And here?
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists