[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450ED746.9030507@opersys.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:28:38 -0400
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
To: jrs@...ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Guanglei Li <guanglei@...ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: The emperor is naked: why *comprehensive* static markup belongs
in mainline
Just one factual correction, the rest of your post I don't wish
to contest. In fact, your support for a unified tool is exactly
where I think things should go.
Jose R. Santos wrote:
> The fact that tracepoint did not vary in a 5 year timespan just proves
> that the users of LTTng are very few.
A rapid lookup will demonstrate that the *old* ltt, for which the
5 year mark was presented, was actually shipped by many distributions,
especially embedded ones.
Thanks,
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists