linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PowerOP, PowerOP Core, 1/2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acd2a5930609181307y793242f3sef5d59487bc7dad@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:07:22 +0400
From:	"Vitaly Wool" <vitalywool@...il.com>
To:	"Eugeny S. Mints" <eugeny.mints@...il.com>
Cc:	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>, "pm list" <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PowerOP, PowerOP Core, 1/2

Eugeny,

On 9/18/06, Eugeny S. Mints <eugeny.mints@...il.com> wrote:

> With such approach a policy manger may compare operating points at runtime and
> should not rely on compile time knowledge about what name corresponds to  what
> set of power parameter values. It uses name as a handle.

I suggest that you supply a meaningful yet simple example for SMP case.

Thanks,
   Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/