| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:46:01 +0400 From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: ak@...e.de, master@...torb.msk.ru, hawk@...u.dk, harry@...os.washington.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20 Hello! > Ok, ok, but don't we have queueing disciplines that need the timestamp > even on ingress? I cannot find. ip_queue does. But it is just another user, not different of sockets. BTW in any case, any user of timestamp who sees 0, because skb was received before timestamping was enabled, has to calculate timestamp itself right in the place where Andi suggested. Seems, preparation to the change makes sense even without the change. :-) Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists