[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b4e42d10609181554s723b54f4y97a233a0a1f30657@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:54:17 -0700
From: "Om Narasimhan" <om.turyx@...il.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>
Cc: linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] potential crash fix : drivers/pcmcia/au1000_generic
On 9/18/06, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:54:17PM -0700, Om Narasimhan wrote:
> > Tested by compiling.
> >
> > I have not subscribed to pcmcia list. Please cc me any comments.
>
> You also haven't described what the 'potential crach' is that you're
> fixing.
Okay, I should have documented that.
Here is the explanation.
The previous code did something like,
if (error) goto out_err;
....
do {
struct au1000_pcmcia_socket *skt = PCMCIA_SOCKET(i);
del_timer_sync(&skt->poll_timer);
pcmcia_unregister_socket(&skt->socket);
out_err:
flush_scheduled_work();
ops->hw_shutdown(skt);
i--;
} while (i > 0)
.....
1. On the error path, skt would not contain a valid value for the
first iteration (skt is masked by uninitialized automatic skt)
2. does not do hw_shutdown() for 0th element of PCMCIA_SOCKET
Does it sound good?
Regards,
Om.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists