| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609180231110.6761@scrub.home> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:43:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> To: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org> Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models Hi, On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Nicholas Miell wrote: > Anyone know what's hard about kprobes on m68k? Roman? A limited kprobes hack wouldn't be that difficult (but would still require more time than I have right now), although it would be barely usable with a large number of traces. Ingo might be able to optimize kprobes on his machine to nothing, but that doesn't help me very much. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists