[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060919120825.GC4965@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:08:25 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:55:44PM -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> 1. They're harder to maintain out of tree.
> 2. they're written in some jibberish awk crap
> 3. They're slower. If you're doing thousands of tracepoints a second,
> into a circular 8GB log buffer, that *does* matter. You want
> to peturb what you're measuring as little as possible.
agreed to all these and I'd like to add:
4. If you merge proper dynamic tracing infrastructure you get static
traces for free. It's just a bunch of macros directly calling
the trace function also used by the dynamic tracing code, maybe
keyed of an enable variable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists