[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45101AFA.9080006@opersys.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:29:46 -0400
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers
Martin Bligh wrote:
> That was always the intent, or codebase + flat patch if really
> necessary. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Ah, ok.
> Not sure we need scripts, just a normal patch diff would do. I'm not
> sure any of this alters the markup debate much ...
It doesn't, just wasn't clear on the function duplication part.
> it just would seem
> to provide a simpler, faster, and more flexible way of hooking in than
> kprobes.
Sure.
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists