linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] autofs4 - zero timeout prevents shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1158641710.3003.29.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:55:10 +0800
From:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	autofs mailing list <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4 - zero timeout prevents shutdown

On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 21:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:33:52 +0800
> Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 21:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:48:15 +0800 (WST)
> > > Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > If the timeout of an autofs mount is set to zero then umounts
> > > > are disabled. This works fine, however the kernel module checks
> > > > the expire timeout and goes no further if it is zero. This is
> > > > not the right thing to do at shutdown as the module is passed
> > > > an option to expire mounts regardless of their timeout setting.
> > > 
> > > Is this a new feature, or a regression since <when>?
> > 
> > It's a regression which I must have introduced a long time ago. I can go
> > back and check the kernels if you'd like more specific info.
> > 
> > It should work this way and a recent report alerted me to it.
> > 
> 
> Well..  I'm trying to work out if it's a 2.6.18 thing or whether we can
> hold it over.

I had a quick look and it appears to be present as far back as 2002/06
in 2.4. I'm a bit puzzled why I haven't seen it before as I'm sure I've
tested this over the years, never the less it looks so clearly wrong to
me know.

It's a bug fix and given it's been around so long, not a widely used.

Personally I'd like to get it into 2.6.18.
As always I'm happy with whatever decision you make.

Ian


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/