linux-kernel - Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609190755.03713.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:55:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, master@...torb.msk.ru, hawk@...u.dk,
	harry@...os.washington.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20

On Monday 18 September 2006 23:22, David Miller wrote:

> Ok, ok, but don't we have queueing disciplines that need the timestamp
> even on ingress?

I grepped and I can't find any. The only non SIOCGTSTAMP users of the
time stamp seem to be sunrpc and conntrack and I bet both can be converted
over to jiffies without trouble.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/