lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158624979.3600.31.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:16:19 -0500
From:	Josh Boyer <jdub@...ibm.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Ferrell <mferrell@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pmc551 remove unnecessary braces

On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 00:47 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c
> index 6d4d5a4..0ee22ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c
> @@ -137,11 +137,11 @@ #endif
>  
>  	pmc551_point(mtd, instr->addr, instr->len, &retlen, &ptr);
>  
> -	if (soff_hi == eoff_hi || mtd->size == priv->asize) {
> +	if (soff_hi == eoff_hi || mtd->size == priv->asize)
>  		/* The whole thing fits within one access, so just one shot
>  		   will do it. */
>  		memset(ptr, 0xff, instr->len);
> -	} else {
> +	else {
>  		/* We have to do multiple writes to get all the data
>  		   written. */
>  		while (soff_hi != eoff_hi) {

I actually find this change to make the code less readable.  Yes, the
braces aren't technically necessary, but the else requires them, and the
comment block before the memset makes this multi-line.

This whole patch is highly user preference, but I'd rather these braces
stay.


> @@ -700,9 +695,8 @@ static int __init init_pmc551(void)
>  
>  		if ((PCI_Device = pci_find_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_V3_SEMI,
>  						  PCI_DEVICE_ID_V3_SEMI_V370PDC,
> -						  PCI_Device)) == NULL) {
> +						  PCI_Device)) == NULL)
>  			break;
> -		}

1) If you're going for coding style, the assignment within the if
condition needs to be moved outside of it.

2) If you're not going to fix 1, then leave the braces.

josh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ