[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158664809.32598.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:20:09 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
christopher.leech@...el.com, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
neilb@...e.de, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: clean up and abstract function types (was
Re: [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations)
Ar Llu, 2006-09-18 am 20:05 -0500, ysgrifennodd Olof Johansson:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:56:37 -0700 "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...il.com> wrote:
> op.src_type = PG; op.src = pg;
> op.dest_type = BUF; op.dest = buf;
> op.len = len;
> dma_async_commit(chan, op);
At OLS Linus suggested it should distinguish between sync and async
events for locking reasons.
if(dma_async_commit(foo) == SYNC_COMPLETE) {
finalise_stuff();
}
else /* will call foo->callback(foo->dev_id) */
because otherwise you have locking complexities - the callback wants to
take locks to guard the object it works on but if it is called
synchronously - eg if hardware is busy and we fall back - it might
deadlock with the caller of dmaa_async_foo() who also needs to hold the
lock.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists