[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609200925280.30572@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
cc: rohitseth@...gle.com, CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
devel@...nvz.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I'm not sure about containers & workload management people, but from
> a core mm/ perspective I see no reason why this couldn't get in,
> given review and testing. Great!
Nack. We already have the ability to manage workloads. We may want to
extend the existing functionality but this is duplicating what is already
available through cpusets.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists