linux-kernel - Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:36:40 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, rohitseth@...gle.com,
	CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>, devel@...nvz.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

Ar Iau, 2006-09-21 am 03:00 +1000, ysgrifennodd Nick Piggin:
>  > I've been thinking a bit on that problem, and it would be possible to
>  > share all address_space pages equally between attached containers, this
>  > would lose some accuracy, since one container could read 10% of the file
>  > and another 90%, but I don't think that is a common scenario.
> 
> 
> Yeah, I'm not sure about that. I don't think really complex schemes
> are needed... but again I might need more knowledge of their workloads
> and problems.

Any scenario which permits "cheating" will be a scenario that happens
because people will try and cheat.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/