[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45117D4D.3040408@opersys.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:41:33 -0400
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
CC: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>, prasanna@...ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers
Hello Hiramatsu-san,
So here's a more intelligent answer than last time :)
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> This method is very similar to the djprobe.
> And I had gotten the same idea to support preemptive kernel.
...
> This means the below code, doesn't this?
> ---
> jmp 1f /* short jump consumes 2 bytes */
> nop
> nop
> nop
> 1:
> ---
YES, as pointed out by Mathieu, this does essentially the same.
And, yes, as mentioned earlier, this should work fine on
preemptable kernels.
> I think the djprobe can provide most of functionalities which
> your idea requires.
Indeed.
Thanks,
Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists