| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0609201354u7251d89en2c224b841b211d8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:54:18 +0200
From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"John Stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
"Dipankar Sarma" <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rt1
Hi,
On 20/09/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the 2.6.18-rt1 tree, which can be downloaded
> from the usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
2.6.18-rt3
Ingo, can you take a look at this bugs?
BUG: scheduling with irqs disabled: softirq-timer/1/0x00000001/17
caller is rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
[<c0104356>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x68/0x193
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c02edb34>] schedule+0x69/0xe3
[<c02ee8c0>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
[<c02eef4f>] rt_spin_lock+0x10/0x2c
[<c0171d6d>] __kmalloc+0xad/0x115
[<c020c146>] soft_cursor+0x52/0x16c
[<c020c00b>] bit_cursor+0x483/0x498
[<c02071ab>] fbcon_cursor+0x218/0x24d
[<c0244ac1>] hide_cursor+0x22/0x61
[<c024811f>] vt_console_print+0x91/0x207
[<c0120d31>] __call_console_drivers+0x6f/0x8c
[<c0120dac>] _call_console_drivers+0x5e/0x67
[<c0121367>] release_console_sem+0x132/0x1f2
[<c0121051>] vprintk+0x28d/0x2f5
[<c01210d3>] printk+0x1a/0x1c
[<c0129ab3>] run_timer_softirq+0x77b/0xbb6
[<c012632c>] ksoftirqd+0x11d/0x200
[<c013386b>] kthread+0xc7/0xf8
[<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Leftover inexact backtrace:
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c02edb34>] schedule+0x69/0xe3
[<c02ee8c0>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
[<c02eef4f>] rt_spin_lock+0x10/0x2c
[<c0171d6d>] __kmalloc+0xad/0x115
[<c020c146>] soft_cursor+0x52/0x16c
[<c020c00b>] bit_cursor+0x483/0x498
[<c02071ab>] fbcon_cursor+0x218/0x24d
[<c0244ac1>] hide_cursor+0x22/0x61
[<c024811f>] vt_console_print+0x91/0x207
[<c0120d31>] __call_console_drivers+0x6f/0x8c
[<c0120dac>] _call_console_drivers+0x5e/0x67
[<c0121367>] release_console_sem+0x132/0x1f2
[<c0121051>] vprintk+0x28d/0x2f5
[<c01210d3>] printk+0x1a/0x1c
[<c0129ab3>] run_timer_softirq+0x77b/0xbb6
[<c012632c>] ksoftirqd+0x11d/0x200
[<c013386b>] kthread+0xc7/0xf8
[<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<c02ef447>] .... __spin_lock+0x12/0x35
.....[<c0129387>] .. ( <= run_timer_softirq+0x4f/0xbb6)
skipping trace printing on CPU#1 != -1
BUG: scheduling while atomic: softirq-timer/1/0x00000001/17, CPU#1
[<c0104356>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x68/0x193
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c02ecc43>] __schedule+0x7d/0xded
[<c02edb8d>] schedule+0xc2/0xe3
[<c02ee8c0>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
[<c02eef4f>] rt_spin_lock+0x10/0x2c
[<c0171d6d>] __kmalloc+0xad/0x115
[<c020c146>] soft_cursor+0x52/0x16c
[<c020c00b>] bit_cursor+0x483/0x498
[<c02071ab>] fbcon_cursor+0x218/0x24d
[<c0244ac1>] hide_cursor+0x22/0x61
[<c024811f>] vt_console_print+0x91/0x207
[<c0120d31>] __call_console_drivers+0x6f/0x8c
[<c0120dac>] _call_console_drivers+0x5e/0x67
[<c0121367>] release_console_sem+0x132/0x1f2
[<c0121051>] vprintk+0x28d/0x2f5
[<c01210d3>] printk+0x1a/0x1c
[<c0129ab3>] run_timer_softirq+0x77b/0xbb6
[<c012632c>] ksoftirqd+0x11d/0x200
[<c013386b>] kthread+0xc7/0xf8
[<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Leftover inexact backtrace:
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c02ecc43>] __schedule+0x7d/0xded
[<c02edb8d>] schedule+0xc2/0xe3
[<c02ee8c0>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
[<c02eef4f>] rt_spin_lock+0x10/0x2c
[<c0171d6d>] __kmalloc+0xad/0x115
[<c020c146>] soft_cursor+0x52/0x16c
[<c020c00b>] bit_cursor+0x483/0x498
[<c02071ab>] fbcon_cursor+0x218/0x24d
[<c0244ac1>] hide_cursor+0x22/0x61
[<c024811f>] vt_console_print+0x91/0x207
[<c0120d31>] __call_console_drivers+0x6f/0x8c
[<c0120dac>] _call_console_drivers+0x5e/0x67
[<c0121367>] release_console_sem+0x132/0x1f2
[<c0121051>] vprintk+0x28d/0x2f5
[<c01210d3>] printk+0x1a/0x1c
[<c0129ab3>] run_timer_softirq+0x77b/0xbb6
[<c012632c>] ksoftirqd+0x11d/0x200
[<c013386b>] kthread+0xc7/0xf8
[<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<c02ef447>] .... __spin_lock+0x12/0x35
.....[<c0129387>] .. ( <= run_timer_softirq+0x4f/0xbb6)
(gdb) l *rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x121/0x1af
0xc02ee79f is in rt_spin_lock_slowlock (/usr/src/linux-rt/kernel/rtmutex.c:660).
655 * enables the seemless use of arbitrary (blocking) spinlocks within
656 * sleep/wakeup event loops.
657 */
658 static void fastcall noinline __sched
659 rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
660 {
661 struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
662 unsigned long saved_state, state;
663
664 debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
l *__spin_lock+0x12/0x35
0xc02ef435 is in __spin_lock (/usr/src/linux-rt/kernel/spinlock.c:222).
217 _raw_write_lock(lock);
218 }
219 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__write_lock_bh);
220
221 void __lockfunc __spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
222 {
223 preempt_disable();
224 spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
225 _raw_spin_lock(lock);
226 }
l *0xc0129387
0xc0129387 is in run_timer_softirq
(/usr/src/linux-rt/include/linux/seqlock.h:148).
143 }
144
145 static __always_inline void __write_seqlock_raw(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
146 {
147 spin_lock(&sl->lock);
148 ++sl->sequence;
149 smp_wmb();
150 }
151
152 static __always_inline void __write_sequnlock_raw(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
SELinux stuff.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
---------------------------------------------
init/1 is trying to acquire lock:
(policy_rwlock){--..}, at: [<c01df7ab>] security_genfs_sid+0x1f/0xeb
but task is already holding lock:
(policy_rwlock){--..}, at: [<c01df88c>] security_fs_use+0x15/0xbb
other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by init/1:
#0: (sel_mutex){--..}, at: [<c01da736>] sel_write_load+0x1b/0x2c0
#1: (&type->s_umount_key#14){--..}, at: [<c01d6de7>]
selinux_complete_init+0x67/0xbe
#2: (policy_rwlock){--..}, at: [<c01df88c>] security_fs_use+0x15/0xbb
stack backtrace:
[<c0104356>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x68/0x193
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c013b795>] __lock_acquire+0x788/0x9be
[<c013bca4>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x72
[<c02ef13d>] rt_read_lock+0x1f/0x5f
[<c01df7ab>] security_genfs_sid+0x1f/0xeb
[<c01df913>] security_fs_use+0x9c/0xbb
[<c01d667e>] superblock_doinit+0xb5/0x6b5
[<c01d6df5>] selinux_complete_init+0x75/0xbe
[<c01e0ec5>] security_load_policy+0xc9/0x275
[<c01da7c1>] sel_write_load+0xa6/0x2c0
[<c0176411>] vfs_write+0xaf/0x153
[<c0176a71>] sys_write+0x3f/0x66
[<c0103216>] sysenter_past_esp+0x63/0xa1
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at sysenter_past_esp+0x63/0xa1
Leftover inexact backtrace:
[<c0104a5a>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
[<c0104b38>] dump_stack+0x1f/0x24
[<c013b795>] __lock_acquire+0x788/0x9be
[<c013bca4>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x72
[<c02ef13d>] rt_read_lock+0x1f/0x5f
[<c01df7ab>] security_genfs_sid+0x1f/0xeb
[<c01df913>] security_fs_use+0x9c/0xbb
[<c01d667e>] superblock_doinit+0xb5/0x6b5
[<c01d6df5>] selinux_complete_init+0x75/0xbe
[<c01e0ec5>] security_load_policy+0xc9/0x275
[<c01da7c1>] sel_write_load+0xa6/0x2c0
[<c0176411>] vfs_write+0xaf/0x153
[<c0176a71>] sys_write+0x3f/0x66
[<c0103216>] sysenter_past_esp+0x63/0xa1
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000000 ]
| 0-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
skipping trace printing on CPU#1 != -1
l *security_genfs_sid+0x1f/0xeb
0xc01df78c is in security_genfs_sid
(/usr/src/linux-rt/security/selinux/ss/services.c:1612).
1607 */
1608 int security_genfs_sid(const char *fstype,
1609 char *path,
1610 u16 sclass,
1611 u32 *sid)
1612 {
1613 int len;
1614 struct genfs *genfs;
1615 struct ocontext *c;
1616 int rc = 0, cmp = 0;
l *security_fs_use+0x15/0xbb
0xc01df877 is in security_fs_use
(/usr/src/linux-rt/security/selinux/ss/services.c:1669).
1664 */
1665 int security_fs_use(
1666 const char *fstype,
1667 unsigned int *behavior,
1668 u32 *sid)
1669 {
1670 int rc = 0;
1671 struct ocontext *c;
1672
1673 POLICY_RDLOCK;
config & dmesg http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/rt/2.6.18-rt1/
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists