linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64/i386 thermal mce: Refactor thermal throttle reporting.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <404ea8000609201354p7313f35as7bbe63cc09a5fc3f@mail.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:54:57 -0700
From:	"Dmitriy Zavin" <dmitriyz@...gle.com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64/i386 thermal mce: Refactor thermal throttle reporting.

Ok, will move the mce_log part into mce.c in x86_64 and go back to
returning 0/1 from therm_throt_process. Then only the x86_64 thermal
mce will mcelog, and no #ifdefs :)

On 9/20/06, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <asm/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> > +#include <asm/therm_throt.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>
>
> Sorry, no such ifdefs allowed. That is what I meant with making the merged code
> worse than split code.
>
> -Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/