[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060920162945.7f442923.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:45 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: clameter@....com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, devel@...nvz.org, npiggin@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
Alan replying to Christoph:
> > Cpusets can share nodes. I am not sure what the problem would be? Paul may
> > be able to give you more details.
>
> If it can do it in a human understandable way, configured at runtime
> with dynamic sharing, overcommit and reconfiguration of sizes then
> great. Lets see what Paul has to say.
Unless I'm missing something (a frequent occurrence) such a use of
cpusets looses on the understandable, is hobbled on the overcommit, and
has to make do with a somewhat oddly limited and not trivial to
configure approximation of the dynamic sharing. And the
reconfiguration would seem to be a great exercise of memory hotunplug
(echos of the original motivation for fake numa - exercising cpusets ;).
Not exactly passing with flying colors ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists