linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64/i386 thermal mce: Refactor thermal throttle reporting.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609200938.51215.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:38:51 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Dmitriy Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64/i386 thermal mce: Refactor thermal throttle reporting.

> +
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <asm/therm_throt.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

Sorry, no such ifdefs allowed. That is what I meant with making the merged code
worse than split code.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/