[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060921095619.0b2f1774@inspiron>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:56:19 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RTC] Remove superfluous call to call to cdev_del()
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:46:06 +0200
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de> wrote:
> If cdev_add() fails there is no good reason to call cdev_del().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
>
> rtc->char_dev.owner = rtc->owner;
>
> if (cdev_add(&rtc->char_dev, MKDEV(MAJOR(rtc_devt), rtc->id), 1)) {
> - cdev_del(&rtc->char_dev);
> dev_err(class_dev->dev,
> "failed to add char device %d:%d\n",
> MAJOR(rtc_devt), rtc->id);
I'm not sure.. this is drivers/char/raw.c:
cdev_init(&raw_cdev, &raw_fops);
if (cdev_add(&raw_cdev, dev, MAX_RAW_MINORS)) {
kobject_put(&raw_cdev.kobj);
unregister_chrdev_region(dev, MAX_RAW_MINORS);
goto error;
}
in case of failure, it does a kobject_put.
tha same call is done by cdev_del.
other drivers have implemented different error paths.
which one is correct?
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists