linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060920170759.c31c0596.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:07:59 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, clameter@....com, npiggin@...e.de,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

Paul M wrote:
> An alternative would be a way of binding files (or directory
> hierarchies) to a particular set of memory nodes. Then you wouldn't
> need to pre-fault the data. Extended attributes might be one way of
> doing it.

Some of the file system folks have considered such use of extended
attributes, yes.

I remain unaware that any relation between that work and cpusets
exists or should exist.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/