[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158799073.7207.35.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:37:53 -0700
From: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch02/05]: Containers(V2)- Generic Linux kernel changes
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:23 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > There are lots of different cases. At least for anonymous memory
> > ->mapping should be free. Perhaps that could be used for anonymous
> > memory and a separate data structure for the important others.
>
> mapping is used for swap and to point to the anon vma.
>
> > slab should have at least one field free too, although it might be a different
> > one (iirc Christoph's rewrite uses more than the current slab, but it would
> > surprise me if he needed all)
>
> slab currently has lots of fields free but my rewrite uses all of them.
> And AFAICT this patchset does not track slab pages.
>
Currently it doesn't track kernel memory. That is why I don't want to
over load any of the existing fields.
> Hmm.... Build a radix tree with pointers to the pages?
>
...my preference is to leave it in page struct...that has non-zero cost.
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists