[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060921162543.GA29714@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:25:44 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: AUDIT=y build failure on ARM
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:44:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:49:08 +0200, Martin Michlmayr said:
> > I get the build failure below with AUDIT=y on ARM. The problem is
> > that lib/audit.c includes asm-generic/audit_dir_write.h which lists a
> > number of syscalls that are not defined on ARM (and some other platforms).
>
> And somebody (I forget who) was complaining that some debugging tool was only available
> on the x86/sparc/ppc families of CPUs, and didn't like Alan Cox's suggestion
> that they go add it.
>
> Given that missing an entire class of syscall (the *at flavors) on an
> architecture isn't a deterrent to inclusion, Alan's response was totally
> on-target....
>
> (I'm presuming the usual reason for such missing syscalls is that nobody
> has bothered trying to run software that uses a *at call on an ARM, so
> nobody's bothered wiring them up and thereby increasing the kernel image
> size on a platform where it's likely to be *very* important?)
They probably should be wired up, but TBH I _always_ miss the addition
of such things. I don't remember there being any notification to arch
maintainers that something was due to be done.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists