linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060921170226.GA7369@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:32:26 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, npiggin@...e.de,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, menage@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org,
	clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:27:34PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> For other resources, such as CPU cycles and network bandwidth, unless
> another bright spark comes up with an insight, I don't see how to
> express the "percentage used" semantics provided by something such
> as CKRM, using anything resembling cpusets.

How abt metered cpusets? Each child cpuset of a metered cpuset
represents a fraction of CPU time alloted to the tasks of the child
cpuset.

> ... Can one imagine having the scheduler subdivide each second of
> time available on a CPU into several fake-CPUs, each one of which
> speaks for one of those sub-second fake-CPU slices?  Sounds too
> weird to me, and a bit too rigid to be a servicable CKRM substitute.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/