[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609211100350.5959@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc7-mm1 -- ppc64 crash in slab_node ??
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I guess the below will fix it. But Christoph's machine would have oopsed
> too, if it had called fallback_alloc() this early. So presumably it did
> not. But yours does. I wonder why?
Hmmm... Fallback during boot? Any zones that have no ZONE_NORMAL memory?
The right fix though is to check for a NULL memory policy in slab_node.
This is the way other mempol functions behave.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/mm/mempolicy.c 2006-09-19 09:27:03.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c 2006-09-21 12:59:09.385528424 -0500
@@ -1136,7 +1136,9 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct
*/
unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
{
- switch (policy->policy) {
+ int pol = policy ? policy->policy : MPOL_DEFAULT;
+
+ switch (pol) {
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
return interleave_nodes(policy);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists