[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609211514470.17238@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc: Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>, Dax Kelson <dax@...ulabs.com>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:00:48PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>
> > for the tarball users they would have to grab
> > multiple patches to get from the last thing that they have to whatever is
> > current.
>
> ketchup solves that problem. One command brings any tree up to current.
so are you saying that ketchup should be used for _all_ access to the vanilla
tree that isn't done via git?
if not then tarballs still have a place.
and how does ketchup deal with patched trees to start with?
> > also people could be behind a firewall that prevents git from working properly,
> > for them tarballs and patches are the right way of doing things.
>
> If they can't git through a firewall, they won't be able to wget a tarball through
> it either.
to work properly git should talk it's own protocol, http/ftp can be allowed (and
authenticated) through firewalls that don't allow the git protocol.
David Lang
> Dave
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists