lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060921.154415.116358287.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	davej@...hat.com
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, davidsen@....com, torvalds@...l.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:05:39 -0400

> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:52:08PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
>  > I think the even/odd idea is great, personally.  And if this
>  > makes some people have to wait a little bit longer for their
>  > favorite feature to get merged, that's tough. :-)
> 
> My concern is that people will 'sit out' the even stage, and
> just accumulate stuff in a single tree they dump once when
> every odd release opens up.

At least they would be dumping on top of "mostly working".
I kind of like that.  It breeds more confidence into the
tree having been working before the dump took place, thus
making the isolation of cause much easier.

> We already have some subsystems that do once-per-release merges,
> and then let fixes build up in their out-of-tree SCM for months
> until the next window. It won't necessarily get worse, but unless
> everyone is participating in the odd/even rules, we won't get
> the benefits that it would offer.

Having odd/even rules kind of adds legitimacy to the per-tree folks
doing the same.  This avoids situations like "why is XXX being an
asshole with his tree, when there are other trees merging new
features this round?".  Having buy-in from everyone is very useful
and gets folks in the correct mindset.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ