[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158802412.6536.127.camel@linuxchandra>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:33:32 -0700
From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, rohitseth@...gle.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch02/05]: Containers(V2)- Generic Linux kernel
changes
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:23 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > There are lots of different cases. At least for anonymous memory
> > ->mapping should be free. Perhaps that could be used for anonymous
> > memory and a separate data structure for the important others.
>
> mapping is used for swap and to point to the anon vma.
>
> > slab should have at least one field free too, although it might be a different
> > one (iirc Christoph's rewrite uses more than the current slab, but it would
> > surprise me if he needed all)
>
> slab currently has lots of fields free but my rewrite uses all of them.
> And AFAICT this patchset does not track slab pages.
>
> Hmm.... Build a radix tree with pointers to the pages?
Yes, that would be a way to isolate the overhead.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@...ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists