linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4511D855.7050100@mbligh.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:09:57 -0700
From:	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

> introduce-config_zone_dma.patch
> optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm.patch
> optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm-tidy.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-i386.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-x86_64.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-ia64.patch
> remove-zone_dma-remains-from-parisc.patch
> remove-zone_dma-remains-from-sh-sh64.patch

Would it not make sense to define what ZONE_DMA actually means
consistently before trying to change it? The current mess across
different architectures seems like a disaster area to me.

What DOES requesting ZONE_DMA from a driver actually mean?

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/