linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] i386 2.6.18 cpu_up: attempt to bring up CPU 4 failed : kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2698!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060922110939.8bf65ed8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:09:39 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	kmannth@...ibm.com
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clameter@...r.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] i386 2.6.18 cpu_up: attempt to bring up CPU 4 failed :
 kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2698!

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:34:03 -0700
keith mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > b) pageset_cpuup_callback()'s CPU_UP_CANCELED path possibly hasn't been
> >    tested before.  I'd be guessing that we're not zeroing out the
> >    zone.pageset[] array when the `struct zone' is first allocated, but I
> >    don't immediately recall where that code lives.
> 

Just a question. Because process_zones(cpu) is called at CPU_UP_PREPARE,
cpu_to_node(cpu) should be fixed before CPU_UP_PREPARE ?
(If so, I should revert a patch I sent today...)

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/