linux-kernel - Re: GPLv3 Position Statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1158948497.3445.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:08:17 -0500
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement

On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:59 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> James, I'm most definitely NOT a kernel developer, just a lurker who 
> occasionally exhibits his lack of knowledge with (usually) dumb questions.
> 
> But, while I can't say the above any better than you have, I do have one 
> question:
> 
> Why is the FSF and RMS not included in the Cc: line of all messages on this 
> subject, so they can have first hand, the benefit of the remarks this 
> group makes by reading about them from the first person?  You folks are, 
> as a group, the movers and shakers in the advancement of linux, and would 
> continue to do so without the gnu trying to claim they invented linux, 
> which we all know is a prevarication.

Basically because this is a discussion document, not an open letter.

We had some discussion amongst a small group of kernel developers.  Now
we're opening it up to the linux community---which we can't do without
effectively going public as well.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/