[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609221126.31201.jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:26:31 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: ZONE_DMA
On Friday, September 22, 2006 11:08 am, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok and right after I sent this my brain returned from vacation and I
> > remembered jejb's DMA allocation API. It's powerful enough to cover
> > most driver use cases I think (users of GFP_DMA should probably be
> > converted), but for example block layer bounce buffering might need a
> > different interface as I see you've proposed in another mail.
>
> Could you dig that out and give us some refs or even better port that
> thing to a current mm tree?
Oh, it's already there in the tree, but obviously some drivers still need
to be converted. See Documentation/DMA-API.txt. It's not PCI specific
like the old PCI DMA interface (Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt) and
provides a way for drivers to specify their addressing limitations
(dma_supported and dma_set_mask), which allows the underlying architecture
code to report a failure if necessary.
I think many of the examples I cited can be converted to use the DMA API,
but block layer bounce buffering might need special treatment or perhaps a
way to get at the underlying struct device for the associated request...
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists