linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4513493F.8090005@sandeen.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:23:59 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode
 diet patch

Timothy Shimmin wrote:

> Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and
> the existing code is different than what yours is based on.
> I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this:
> 
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.254
> date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05;  author: nathans;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -5
> modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a
> Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure
> ----------------------------
> I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old).
> 
> I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them.
> 
> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
> one above).


Ah, ok, thanks guys.  Should have checked CVS I guess.

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/