[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45146F76.3010301@sandeen.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:19:18 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode
diet patch
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
>> one above).
>>
>
> eh? Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree. If I
> go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you
> guys merge the above mystery patch. (I prefer to merge the -mm patches
> after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I
> get bored of waiting).
>
> Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff
> from me? ;)
>
>
well it's in cvs:
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h
but I'm too lazy to check git on a friday evening. :)
Well, sgi-guys, I'll let you sort out which patch you want. Sorry for not
checking cvs first!
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists