[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060922064955.GA4167@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:49:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
prasanna@...ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@...ibm.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)
* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > "As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes
> > just can't instrument it."
> >
> > but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway,
> > we want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having
> > to modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...
>
> Then you lose the ability to trace in-kernel minor page faults.
that's wrong, minor pagefaults go through __handle_mm_fault() just as
much.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists